Saturday, 5 November 2016

Family love

When I was a child occasionally somebody, usually my father, would say Family Love, which was the signal for the four of us to make a circle, facing inwards with arms around one another and say a long drawn out Aaaah for the space, at least, that our breath lasted. Our different voices merging together it was a simple and wonderful thing, full of love, security and affirmation. Where did that come from? I asked. He thought his own parents but we both found it hard to picture my grandfather in that domestic scenario. Perhaps it was you and granny, I said. Perhaps. Or, he said, reconsidering. Perhaps we just started it ourselves. I considered myself fortunate.

The idea of love, extended reminded me that when they were very little I used to ask my sons who for them was in our family. For years after she left they included 'Tiggy' the marvellous (so much more than) au pair who lived with us for about nine months and came back to see us twice afterwards. Tiggy was so loved and appreciated that she was truly part of the family. The youngest, who was a baby and toddler when she was here was at least as insistent in this as his older brother.



The day after I wrote this the children came home with fingerprint family trees. There was no Tiggy in the family any more. That is understandable because since starting a life in her own country with a boyfriend, a dog and working in a children's outdoor nursery have not seen her in several years. 

-  Do you remember when you included Tiggy in our family? I asked the elder. 
-  Yes
-  Is it different now just because we haven’t seen her for a long time? 
-  Yes, he said, factually though maybe not without regret.

On the trees, one child included his aunt and uncle in remote Manchester, one did not. Neither child included the adored baby cousins born in June whom they saw twice in the summer holidays. Are your [much loved] uncle and aunt not in the family? I asked one, curiously rather than accusing. They are, he said, sheepishly.  There just wasn’t room.

I asked the younger why the babies were not in the tree, but their parents were.  He hesitated.  "Is it maybe because they live far away or are so new?', I asked.  "So new" he said.  "When  would they  be big enough to be included?" I asked.  After New Year he said, happily and decisively.   "Is that because it's the right time of year or just because they'll be bigger then?" I said, still curious.   "They'll be bigger then."  He said.  "Ah", I said.  "When they can sit up maybe."  "Yes", he said, clearly.  "When they can sit up.  And..." he said, going down the stairs, "I was running out of room..."  





Memory fades, people change and love shifts emphasis but that is why photographs, if they are 'things' at at all, must be among the most precious.

Friday, 4 November 2016

Love, in words

Continuing a theme: "Perhaps we love more than we believe, admit, or realise", but in ways different to how we conventionally think of it.  

The way we use language is revealing: “I loved seeing them again.”; “It was lovely to dance with him.”, “It was great that we went out for that meal together.” To a friend recently: "I love getting messages from you! They're so funny and interesting." Don’t we say these sorts of things all the time? 

It cannot just be the act of seeing or dancing, walking, or having a drink that we love, though of course we can enjoy these alone.  When we say we loved doing these things, it is the together, the with him, the seeing them that gives it meaning within the context. We love doing these things with these people.  Love is more than the deep and scary love we have for the people closest to us; scary because between new lovers it is tied to loss of control, and for others we love deeply it is tied to loss or the fear of it. I think we love, perhaps more in the Greek ways, many people in our lives.

In the same book I quoted from last time I recognised the truth of:

"To love a thing means wanting it to live" - Confucius

Thursday, 3 November 2016

Love circumscribed, love extended

I'm afraid I lost ardour for the Brexit topic.  Maybe I'll come back to it.


The Meaning of Things, A.C Grayling.

I had read this not long before starting to think more about what connection means here. I started to realise  the topics that turned up in tango turned up in life.  In that respect it was true that, as they say, a journey dancing tango was in many ways like a mirror, a way of seeing life.   Where to put then the thoughts on life that came from tango?  There is no shortage of topics on tango in The Outpost so the flotsam and jetsam that constitute these thoughts have washed up here in The Intertidal Zone. 

In our culture it is normal to say we love our partner(s), parents, children, family, but less common to say that we love beyond that. Do we love more than we believe, admit, or realise?  Are we sometimes out of synch with what and who we believe we love and what and who we actually love? Do we love more than we think, just in different ways to how conventionally, analytically, societally, we conceive it?  Is this because of the limits of our words and therefore, our conventions?

The Greeks better understood the forms of love. It makes me wonder if our single world "love" means we enjoy fewer rich and meaningful social connections.