Sunday, 18 April 2021

Magnolia

Magnolia, South Inch, Perth


Magnolia is one of the most primitive of ancient flowering plants.  Sixty million years evolving and here it is, budding, miraculous since early spring, in Britain of all places, in Scotland even.  

It is an un-British plant, far too glam.  What is it?  Half flower, half tree? A gloriously flowering tree.  But we can't mention Britishness.  Britishness, if it ever existed after the Queen's 1977 silver jubilee, is a dirty, anachronistic phrase, especially in Scotland.  It's only England versus Scotland now, like a raucous, aggressive football match.  What symbol, which value might be used to talk about Britain? A bacon sandwich?  Fish and chips?  None of that -  the Muslims, the vegans, the climate catastrophe - all very inappropriate.  

I discovered last week there is such a thing as a "sensitivity reader" - people employed by publishing houses to remark on whether, for example, a racial portrayal is too crass, banal or misguided.  A 'stalinist' concept said a friend.  It reminded me of going to a poetry reading and hearing a general warning to the audience of a "triggering" topic - a reminder of the heightened sensitivities of what is sometimes cruelly called the snowflake generation.  I don't know about stalinist but it does rather put the kibosh on writing about anything other than your own "lived experience" as they say nowadays.  Where does that leave imagination and fiction, I wonder?   

Where would that in fact leave something like LLoyd Jones' 'Mr Pip'?  The New Zealand author and former journalist wrote a convincing story of the Bougainville war from the perspective of black villagers, and a teenage girl, at that, without apparently ever setting foot on the island. Part of his research seems to have been an account he heard from a man who had experienced the war, with whom he spent a night on board a ship. How did he pull the story off?  Or did he?  What do people living there, who lived through the war, think of the story? Does it matter?  It matters, commercially at least, if, in the brave new world of social media your readers have followers and the lived experience of the subject of your writing but you do not. But what's not to like about onlywriting about your own experience?  It'll make everything authentic, right?

Is there some other representation of Britishness?  Tolerance and democracy maybe?  Perhaps, but how does that distinguish us from anywhere else that has free elections and the supposedly impartial rule of law?  Britishness is historically tied to flags and identity which, with immigration, multi-culturalism and racism is going to be a messy, complicated, unsettling thing.

Yet Scottish nationalism flourishes here, wildly, like the thistle.  Across the world, nearly everywhere in Europe, nationalism itself is seen as dangerous, populist, vulgar even, something the uneducated and overly emotional engage with.  You might think Nazi nationalism would be enough for the word to cause even now, a sickening sense, a rising bile.  Here in Scotland the SNP has overtly socialist policies and those two words nationalism and socialism sit badly together.  But fear not, the SNP also seems to want to be part of Europe so if you like you can believe the more elevated part of that tribe that says they don't hate the English or other countries (or maybe just the English), they just want to run their own affairs.  Still, I can't hep but worry at some of their more totalitarian tendencies. Education is run with a heavy hand here:  the tone, the policies, the socialist-inspired levelling down, the distrust of families, the head teachers they put in charge of schools. 

But nationalism isn't defined by left or right.  In 2017 Austria's nationalist FPO party took 26% of the vote.  Only five years ago,  in Norbert Hofer Austria nearly had the first far-right European head of state.  He was only narrowly defeated by, of all things, a Green.  

Like the rhododendrons in Rodney Gardens this magnolia has been damaged a little, maybe by the low night time temperatures but it is still attractive. There is the stunning colour, the creamy petals, the upright structure, the effort of the bloom, despite the frosts, the lift, upon seeing it, of the heart. 

The Japanese concept of wabi-sabi has the concept of imperfection through the wear of time.  Can it apply also to plants, slightly imperfect?  The magnolia hasn't quite flourished as it might.  It is a reminder of how this season was this year - bright in the days and cold at night. Sun in the morning, snow in the afternoon.    Was it just chance or part of the growing climate catastrophe?  Either way, it presages what we may face in seasons to come. 

"I didn't see you in the park when I walked the dog," I said to my nearly twelve-year-old.  He is outgrowing some of the play equipment.  
"We were sitting in the trees," he said.  

They have always done it.  There used to be a different tree in the playpark that was popular for climbing.  It wasn't high but it was a challenge to get up.  The children used to give each other bunk-ups and there was only room in the climbable part for two kids at a time.  Maybe it broke or the council cut the solid branch off to stop the climbing.  Perhaps somebody complained. I have seen that is what brings about change in this town.

They can't do that to a magnolia though, without cutting down the whole tree.  The magnolia is a social tree - low branches, easy to climb, to perch in, wide, to accommodate friends.  Who, I wonder, has thought to plant magnolia trees in parks, for no better reason than for children? 

When I first moved here, Perth was dazzlingly white.  Coming from five years in London, the latter two in Southwark, where I could easily be the only white person on the bus, it was what I noticed most.  At the baby groups in the A.K. Bell library, the one Indian woman hung about on the fringes.  With my next child, it was the same, one black woman, on her own.  No one spoke to her much either.  Anyone sounding English, anyone not from Perth even, was also excluded, not least by the ice princess who ran the group and seemed to hate small children.  For years afterwards we went to Oxfam, not the A.K. Bell until the temperature there warmed a couple of degrees.   

My mum friend at the time, who was from England, couldn't take the cultural chill and not just of the library.  Like me, she had had a good job in London prior to parenthood.  She tried and tried to make friends and get involved in this town and in Crieff, to the west with more optimism and energy than I ever mustered.  She chaired the NCT, ran coffee mornings and went to myriad mum and baby groups.  She seemed to have a built-in support network and babysitting from other teaching families at Glenalmond, the eye wateringly expensive private school, to which she had recently moved with her teacher husband.  She ran a wonderful, extravagant party for her two-year-old with a bouncy castle and teenage helpers galore.  In a documentary about the school, shocked, we saw her sobbing.  They moved to another exclusive private school, somewhere mellow and golden-sounding in England, Gloucestershire I think.  

My family was here.  I had roots and memories in Scotland.  Half Scottish I had even been to school briefly, in what we, still in the late seventies called Kincardineshire but I envied her at the time.  Another English friend left, for Wales. I felt as stranded and out of place as the erratic rock on top of St Magdalene's Hill.  In years to come, someone told me about muttered racist comments from parents in the playground about the eastern Europeans who had not long before arrived.

There was a group of teenagers and twenty-somethings in the park.  Black, brown, white, and a guitar.  Look and look again.  It was the first time in fourteen years I had seen such a mixed group relaxing together in the park. A young Romanian mother, her head covered with a small triangle of cloth, called to her children.  My son's school is on this park, which we call the Inch, meaning meadow. His classmates are Czech, Spanish, Romanian, Syrian.  His lovely Polish teacher was one of the nicest we ever had.  

The school is thoroughly multicultural now, even though religious worship in the Scottish tradition is still, anachronistically forced upon the children six times a year in law.  The stricture of a culturally specific religion is in contrast to the diversity of the people.  It seems more than irrelevant now, laughable even, though my blood still boils when I remember the zealously religious head in our first school and my carefully brainwashed three year old coming home from nursery singing "Jesus loves me".

The children were in the park again the other day.  It was another perfect spring afternoon.  Teenagers in seated groups on the grass chatted around shared food.  Children ran, shrieking, between the flying fox and the climbing frame.  Adults grazed at the picnic benches. The sun was out, the sky was blue, the straight reeds reflected wavily in the water, birds scattered across the pond.  In the budding, welcoming magnolia children from all places festooned the branches, chatting.  

Sunday, 11 April 2021

Acknowledgement

When my
hands shook,
heart beat close to the skin
where it shouldn't be
where it was far too thin
but I couldn't say why.
When I
cried suddenly, provoked
by nothing as people are
long after someone dies,
wore a hat all the time,
hid my eyes;
jumped at the door,
the toaster,
the person at the door,
when I opened that same door;
held a knot in the throat,
in the shoulders high and tight;
couldn't speak,
didn't breathe,
couldn't sleep,
wouldn't sleep,
then slept, with dread,
with a knife by my bed.

Saturday, 10 April 2021

Prince Philip

However irrational the monarchy seems, after watching, the day after the Duke of Edinburgh died,  the documentary "The Duke: In his own words" it was hard to see the monarchy haters in anything other than rather poor light.  Prince Philip was a powerhouse of energy, duty, innovation and improving works, from the solar panels he installed at Windsor in the sixties to of course the much lauded Duke of Edinburgh Award.

It was clear there was far more to the Duke than the simplistic portrayal of him in the press.  With trademark self-deprecation he had remarked: "have become a caricature. There we are. I’ve just got to live with it.”  

It is a shame that it is only now that the tributes play that out that more than that caricature is seen: an able, modest, witty man.  He said some appalling, crass and shocking things but I am sure many enjoyed his description of the press as 'reptiles'.  

When asked what he was proudest of, he said with that modesty and the experience and realism of someone who has lived for a long time, the fact that "It's still going".  I think he meant the community of Windsor Castle and the park.  "People forget how much any organism needs to be kept going [...] because if you hadn't done it something worse might have occurred"

Within the limitations of his role, he steered his own course down to the last detail.  At the formal annual lunch for the Knights of the Garter the steward, issuing orders said: "We put the wine on all the tables with the water jugs and the beers we'll only put on the Duke's table because it's only the Duke who's going to have one."  I wondered if this famously masculine man, who devoted his life to the Queen's role, thought wine a bit affected for men. Probably he just preferred beer.

The Duke had been REME's colonel-in-chief. During his REME career dad met him about three times. 
"What was he like?"
"He was alright," said dad, sounding pretty bored. By the time I spoke to him only 24 hours after the Duke's death was announced he was fed up with the intense coverage.
"He was jovial, interested in people," he conceded.
At least where his immediate family is concerned, dad prefers to talk than listen. It's a reminder to us that he is still the boss. He is a mine of stories and told me a related one. It was in Bordon when he was a young captain. Prince Philip was visiting the garrison. These things were very formally organised down to the last detail. The instruction came out for meeting the Duke: "Officers will congregate in informal groups as shown in annexe A." Annexe A showed circles labelled Group A, Group B etc around the anteroom. Appendix 1 to annexe A showed the list of officers in each informal group.
"That's the way these things are done", said dad. With similar wry humour, he said, "I consider it a measure of achievement in my career that I moved from being a member of an informal group to an "informal group commander".

When he arrived the Duke confounded everyone. He was supposed to be shepherded around anticlockwise, meeting everyone but he turned, quite deliberately dad thought, and went the other way.

Later he met him at Rheindahlen on a visit to the corps at a reception in the headquarters. The Duke asked dad about his role. Dad said, "Well, I'm First Armoured Division, Commander Maint" and went on to introduce his colleagues.
"First Armoured Division, where's that?" asked the Duke.
Dad explained it was the area around Verden, Fallingbostel, Hohne.
"Ah yes, I've been to Fallingbostel," said the Duke. Fallingbostel could be endlessly cold and bleak and was not a popular posting. Dad nearly said, but thought better of it "Yes, the soldiers know is effing b."
"That's too bad," I said. he probably would have liked that.
"He probably would have," agreed dad.

St George's House at Windsor was an idea of the Duke's.  Along with the former Dean of Windsor the Duke "converted some old staff quarters into a centre dedicated to exploring society's greatest challenges".  It was a place for movers and shakers who might not ordinarily meet to talk together privately.  Chatham House Rules were the only condition.  The interviewer commented that "It's a very dynamic body in a very ancient setting," got a bit mixed up with his point saying it seemed to work very well but wasn't the juxtaposition a bit odd.  The Duke,  with the refreshing plain speaking for which he is famous remarked as if to a slightly slow student: "Yes but walls don't dominate the inhabitants. When I come here I don't become medieval. It's ridiculous.  I'm still who I am.  The fact that we live in old walls doesn't make a blind bit of difference."

I felt sorry for him when Queen Victoria's mausoleum came up:

"Maybe we can stop here sir?"
"With what end in view?"
"To talk about the mausoleum and..."
"A mauoleum's a mausoleum! There's not much you can say about it."
"I just think it would be a good way to take a picture of it and you.  Would that be alright sir?  Very quickly?"
It was clear that was the point:  the Duke and death.  But he conceded, chuckling. 

"What would you like to be your lasting legacy?"
"Would you go through life trying to make a legacy?" he replied, laughing.  "No, I mean I think to try and create a memorial to yourself while you're alive is slightly indecent I think. I'd rather other people decided what legacy I'd left, I mean I'm not trying to create one.  Life's going to go on after me.  If I can make life marginally more tolerable for the people who come afterwards, or even of the time, I'd be delighted."

His understated humour was evident when talking about the Military Knights of Windsor whose role it is to pray for the royal family and the Knights of the Order of the Royal Garter.  

Dad had served with another REME officer who had become a military knight upon retirement from the army.  David commanded one of the REME schools at Arborfield when dad was commanding the garrison there.  Dad recalled a long and boring day he'd spent at the corps small arms shooting competition. David came in to see him and dad remarked, that small arms shooting must be the most boring spectator sport going.
"Not a chance," said David, "I'm chair of the army's Night Orienteering Club."

Prince Philip, a formal naval officer seemed to rather like the thought that the Naval Knights, who had the Military Knights' job at Windsor previously, were evidently none too saintly and were kicked out in the eighteenth century for bad behaviour.  He wasn't so sure whether the current knights actually do pray, prompting the question:  "Do you feel adequately prayed for ?"  With a grin, he replied, "Oh, quite adequately, yeah".  

But his real thoughts about the Knights were ever practical:  it was a bit of pageantry and the fact that they bring life to the part of the castle where they live.  Later, talking about the Knights of the Garter procession he mentioned pageantry again "Rationally it's lunatic but I mean in practice everyone enjoys it, I think" which seemed to rather preclude the question that might have been asked: "Is pageantry important?"  

Would he have gone so far as to question whether the institution he was part of was fairly ludicrous?  For a man who seemed to dislike fuss and ceremony he was a key part of the biggest ceremonial institution of them all.  Did he recognise the contradiction?  He was from a different era, after all.  In the interview he referred to himself "in the twentieth century," meaning now, before making the correction.  In 1901, only twenty years before his birth, all but four of Europe's nations were monarchies. Still, here was a seemingly very rational man caught by circumstance really in an institution he very possibly thought as ludicrous as the pageantry he supported. Why?  Maybe just because he joined it for love and had to make the best of it.

Dad remarked that "One very good reason for the monarchy's existence is that it is the focus of loyalty for the armed forces, whereas in other countries it's parliament. Ask a soldier to whom do you owe your loyalty? And the answer will be: To the queen. That's a huge safety net and it's why the UK is stable."
"Well I don't know about that last point," I said. "We're not a nation of hotheads." 
 "If any Prime Minister tried to seize power", he went on, "because of the army's loyalty he probably would not succeed."
I paused over the "he" and let it go.  
"But," he continued, "A lot of them have made a mess of the rest of it: incompetent, make stupid mistakes, can't stay married..."
"Can't stay married? Isn't that bit intolerant? You sound like Prince Philip."
"Well, good. They have a lot more space to live with each other than you or I or anyone else. They can put up with any difficulties they have. Plenty of them made a big mess of it."  I considered the Duke might have agreed.
"Perhaps Charles did the right thing separating from Diana, finally making the right choice for himself?" 
I knew this would catch because the folks weren't Diana fans, especially after that doe-eyed interview.
"Well, perhaps."
"But you can't have it both ways, dad."
"What do you mean?" he said irascibly, probably wanting to get back to the sport.  "I'm not having anything any way."
"You can't say one the one hand that they should have stayed married and on the other that Charles eventually made the right choice with Camilla."
"They all should have got it right in the first place. I've managed it and I have far less space to live with my wife. Why can't they?"
"Maybe you were lucky in your wife...."
"No, she was lucky with me."